Exploring the Efficiency of Smallhold Coffee Farms in Senator Ninoy Aquino, Sultan Kudarat: A Mixed-Methods Study
Keywords:
technical efficiency, data envelopment analysis, smallholder coffee farming, binary logistic regression, returns-to-scale, PhilippinesAbstract
Coffee farming in Sultan Kudarat, Philippines, faces persistent productivity challenges driven by rising input costs, aging tree stock, and limited access to financial and extension services. Yet empirical evidence on the technical efficiency of smallholder coffee farms in this region—and on the farm-level and socioeconomic determinants of that efficiency—remains absent from the published literature. This study assessed the relative technical efficiency of 50 registered smallholder coffee farmers in Senator Ninoy Aquino, Sultan Kudarat, using a mixed-methods design that integrated Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with binary logistic regression and qualitative documentary analysis of inefficient decision-making units (DMUs). The DEA model specified coffee bean yield (kg) as the single output variable and farm size (m²), labor cost (PhP), fertilizer (kg), pesticides (L), herbicides (L), and technology and equipment cost (PhP) as inputs. Under the constant returns to scale (CRS) assumption, the mean technical efficiency score was 0.682, rising to 0.995 under variable returns to scale (VRS). Scale efficiency averaged 0.682, with 72% of DMUs operating below optimal scale under increasing returns to scale (IRS) and only 28% achieving full CRS efficiency. Binary logistic regression confirmed that none of the twelve socioeconomic determinants—including age, gender, education, civil status, household size, farming experience, landholding, off-farm activities, credit access, extension services, infrastructure access, and livestock ownership—significantly predicted technical efficiency status at the α = 0.05 level (Pseudo R² = 0.1229). Qualitative responses from the two worst-performing DMUs revealed three interconnected categories of constraint: input cost escalation and capital inaccessibility, climate-related production shocks, and structural socioeconomic disadvantages in credit and infrastructure access. The findings indicate that scale expansion in factor inputs—particularly farm size, labor, and capital—represents the primary pathway to efficiency improvement for currently sub-optimal DMUs, and that institutional interventions addressing credit access, infrastructure investment, and climate risk management are essential for sustainable productivity gains in this sector.
References
Aung, Y. M., Khor, L. Y., Tran, N., Shikuku, K. M., & Zeller, M. J. (2021). Technical efficiency of small-scale aquaculture in Myanmar: Does women's participation in decision-making matter? Aquaculture Reports, 21, 100841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100841
Bilsborrow, R. E. (2020). Economic and related aspects of land use on islands: A meta-perspective. Land Use Policy, 11, 11–62.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Basic DEA models. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, & L. M. Seiford (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications (pp. 23–47). Springer.
Coelli, T. J., Prasada Rao, D. S., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.
Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259.
Elias, S., Worju, A., & Mathewos, N. (2017). Technical efficiency of smallholder coffee farmers in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A stochastic frontier approach. Asian Scientific Research Journal, 7(4), 147–153.
Hassan, M. (2022). Mixed-methods research: Types and analyses. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(10), 1–14.
Kamau, V., Ateka, J., & Kavoi, M. (2017). Assessment of technical efficiency of smallholder coffee farming enterprises in Muranga, Kenya. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology, 18(1), 12–23.
Kimaro, P. J. (2020). Analysis of influence of livelihood capabilities on coffee production among small-scale coffee farmers in Hai and Arumeru Districts, Tanzania [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Moshi Co-operative University.
Krishnan, S. (2017). Sustainable coffee production. In D. DellaSala & M. Goldstein (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of environmental science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.224
Luat, Y., Mendoza, J., To, M., & Cabauatan, R. (2021). A study on the economic sustainability of local coffee production in the Philippines. International Journal of Social Policy and Law, 2(5), 12–26.
Minh, N. K., Trang, N. T. K., & Chen, K. Z. (2016). Technical efficiency and its determinants in Vietnamese coffee production. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development, 26(1), 1–18.
Ngango, J., & Kim, S. G. (2019). Assessment of technical efficiency and its potential determinants among small-scale coffee farmers in Rwanda. Agriculture, 9(7), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9070161
Ngeywo, J., Basweti, E., & Shitandi, A. (2015). Influence of gender, age, marital status and farm size on coffee production: A case of Kisii County, Kenya. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology, 5(3), 117–125.
Nurhapsa, N., Nuddin, A., Suherman, S., & Barbara, B. (2020). The elasticity of factors of production on smallholder coffee farms in South Sulawesi. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 8(2), 1–10.
Nyagaka, D. O. (2009). Analysis of production efficiency in Irish potato production in Kenya: The case of Nyandarua North District [Unpublished master's thesis]. Egerton University.
Poudel, K. L., Johnson, T. G., Yamamoto, N., Gautam, S., & Mishra, B. (2015). Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in rural hill region of Nepal using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Organic Agriculture, 5, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0110-y
PSA (Philippine Statistics Authority). (2017). Major non-food and industrial crops quarterly bulletin. PSA.
PSA (Philippine Statistics Authority). (2018). Philippine statistics yearbook. PSA.
Sabroso, L. M., & Tamayo, A. M. (2022). Technical efficiency estimates of coffee production in Davao City, Philippines: A data envelopment approach. European Journal of Economic and Financial Research, 6(2), 1–18.
Shi, X. (2018). Heterogeneous effects of rural-urban migration on agricultural productivity: Evidence from China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 10(3), 482–497.
Wambua, B. N., Ndirangu, S. N., Njeru, L. K., & Gichimu, B. M. (2019). Determinants of technical efficiency in smallholder coffee production in Kenya. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(2), 41–47.
Yoga, A. P., Syahni, R., & Hasnah, H. (2023). Technical efficiency of coffee farming in Lima Puluh Kota Regency, West Sumatra Province. Journal of Economics, 12(3), 1786–1796.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Joemarie Pono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.